1. Now at that time the Khabbaggiya Bhikkhus thinking, 'No one knows that we are
guilty' listened to the Pâtimokkha. The Thera Bhikkhus, who understood the
thoughts of other men, told the Bhikkhus, saying, 'Such and such a one, Sirs,
and such and such a one, Khabbaggiya Bhikkhus, thinking, "No one knows that we
are guilty," are listening to the Pâtimokkha.'
When the Khabbaggiya Bhikkhus heard that, they, thinking 'the good Bhikkhus will
(otherwise) first interdict the Pâtimokkha to us,' interdicted the Pâtimokkha to
the Bhikkhus who were pure and innocent before (they had time to do so to them),
and this without ground and without cause.
Those Bhikkhus who were moderate murmured, &c (as usual, down to) told the
matter to the Blessed One.
'Is it true, O Bhikkhus, that the Khabbaggiya Bhikkhus have [acted thus]?'
'It is true, Lord!'
Then he rebuked them, and when he had delivered a religious discourse, he said:
'The Pâtimokkha is not, O Bhikkhus, to be interdicted to pure and innocent
Bhikkhus without ground and without cause. Whosoever does so, shall be guilty of
a dukkata.
2. 'There is one kind of inhibition of the Pâtimokkha, O Bhikkhus, which is
illegal, and one
p. 308
which is legal. There are two . . . ., three . . . ., four (&c., up to) ten
kinds of inhibition of the Pâtimokkha which are illegal, and one, two (&c., up
to) ten which are legal.
3. 'Which is the one kind of inhibition of the Pâtimokkha which is illegal? When
one inhibits the Pâtimokkha for a breach of morality without ground. This is the
one kind, &c.
'And which is the one kind of inhibition of the Pâtimokkha which is legal? When
one inhibits the Pâtimokkha for a breach of morality with good ground. This is
the one kind, &c.
'And which are the two kinds of inhibition of the Pâtimokkha which are illegal?
When one inhibits the Pâtimokkha for a breach of morality, or for an offence
against conduct, and each of them without ground. These are the two kinds, &c.
'And which are the two kinds of inhibition of the Pâtimokkha which are legal?
When one inhibits the Pâtimokkha for a breach of morality, and for an offence
against conduct, and each of them with good ground. These are the two kinds, &c
'And which are the three kinds, &c.? [as the last two, adding "offence against
doctrine."]
'And which are the four kinds, &c.? [as the last, adding "offence against the
right mode of livelihood."]
'And which are the five kinds of inhibition of the Pâtimokkha which are illegal?
When one inhibits the Pâtimokkha for a Pârâgika, or for a Samghâdisesa, or for a
Pâkittiya, or for a Pâtidesanîya, or for a Dukkata, and each of them without
ground. These are the five kinds, &c.
'And which are the five kinds of inhibition of the
p. 309
[paragraph continues] Pâtimokkha which are legal? [Same as the last, "with good
ground."]
'And which are the six kinds of inhibition of the Pâtimokkha which are illegal?
When one inhibits the Pâtimokkha for an offence against morality . . . . conduct
. . . . doctrine 1 . . . . without ground, the offence being one of
omission--when one inhibits the Pâtimokkha for an offence against morality . . .
. conduct . . . . doctrine . . . . without ground, the offence being one of
commission 2. These are the six, &c.
'And which are the six kinds of inhibition of the Pâtimokkha which are legal?
[Same as the last, "with good ground."]
'And which are the seven kinds of inhibition of the Pâtimokkha which are
illegal? When one inhibits the Pâtimokkha for a Pârâgika, or for a Samghâdisesa,
or for a Thullakkaya, or for a Pâkittiya, or for a Pâtidesanîya, or for a
Dukkata, or for a Dubbhâsita, and each of them without ground. These are the
seven kinds, &c.
'And which are the seven kinds of inhibition of the Pâtimokkha which are legal?
[Same as the last, "with good ground."]
'And which are the eight kinds of inhibition of the Pâtimokkha which are
illegal? [The same as the six, adding "offence against the right means of
livelihood."]
p. 310
'And which are the nine kinds of inhibition of the Pâtimokkha which are illegal
. . . . legal? [The same as the six, adding for each kind of offence, "the
offence being one both of omission and of commission."]
'And which are the ten kinds of inhibition of the Pâtimokkha which are illegal?
When (a Bhikkhu) who has been guilty of a Pârâgika is not seated in that
assembly 1,--when no discussion is still going on (in the assembly) as to a
Pârâgika offence (supposed to have been committed by a Bhikkhu then
present),--when (a Bhikkhu) who has abandoned the precepts 2 is not seated in
that assembly,--when no discussion is still going on (in the assembly) in
respect of (a Bhikkhu then present having been charged with) abandoning the
precepts,--when (the person charged) submits himself to the legally prescribed
concord (of the assembly) 3,--when (the person charged) does not withdraw his
acceptance of the legally prescribed concord (of the assembly) 4,--when no
discussion is still going on (in the assembly) in respect of the withdrawal of
(any member's) acceptance of the legally (prescribed) concord (of the
assembly),--when (the Bhikkhu charged) has not been suspected of an offence
against morality, nor seen (to have committed one), nor heard (to have committed
one)--. . . . of an offence against conduct--. . . . of an
p. 311
offence against doctrine These are the ten kinds, &c.
And which are the ten kinds of inhibition of the Pâtimokkha which are legal?
[The same as the last, positive instead of negative.]
4. 'And how (can it be legally said that) a Bhikkhu who has been guilty of a
Pârâgika offence is seated in the assembly?
'In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu sees that (another) Bhikkhu is incurring a
Pârâgika offence by those means, marks, and signs by which the incurring of a
Pârâgika offence is brought about. Or in case a Bhikkhu does not himself see
that (another) Bhikkhu is incurring a Pârâgika offence, but another Bhikkhu
inform the (first-mentioned) Bhikkhu, saying, "Such and such a Bhikkhu, Sir, has
been guilty of a Pârâgika offence." Or in case a Bhikkhu does not himself see
that another Bhikkhu is incurring a Pârâgika offence, but that one himself
inform the (first-mentioned) Bhikkhu, saying, "I, Sir, have been guilty of a
Pârâgika offence."
'(In either of these cases), O Bhikkhus, if he seem to do so, the Bhikkhu may,
on the ground of what he has seen and heard and suspected, bring forward the
following resolution on an Uposatha day, on the fourteenth or fifteenth day of
the month, at a time when that individual is present in the midst of the Samgha:
"Let the venerable Samgha hear me. Such and such an individual has been guilty
of a Pârâgika offence. I interdict for him the Pâtimokkha, to the effect that
the Pâtimokkha ought not to be recited at a time when he is present." That is a
legal inhibition of the Pâtimokkha.
'If, when the Pâtimokkha his been inhibited for
p. 312
that Bhikkhu, the assembly should rise on account of any one or other of the Ten
Dangers 1--danger arising from the king, or from thieves, or from fire, or from
water, or from human beings, or from non- human beings, or from beasts of prey,
or from creeping things, or danger of life, or danger against chastity--the
Bhikkhu may, if he desire to do so, bring forward the following resolution,
either in that circle of residence or in another circle of residence, at a time
when that individual is present in the midst of the assembly: "Let the venerable
Samgha hear me. A discussion had commenced with regard to a Pârâgika offence of
such and such a person, but that matter was not decided. If the time seems meet
to the Samgha, let the Samgha decide that matter." If he thus succeed, it is
well. If not, then on an Uposatha day, on the fourteenth or fifteenth day of the
month, at a time when that individual is present in the midst of the Samgha, let
him bring forward the following resolution: "Let the venerable Samgha hear me. A
discussion had commenced with regard to a Pârâgika offence of such and such a
person, but that matter was not decided. I interdict the Pâtimokkha for him to
the effect that the Pâtimokkha ought not to be recited at a time when he is
present." That is a legal inhibition of the Pâtimokkha.
5. 'And how (can it be legally said that a Bhikkhu) who has abandoned the
precepts is seated in the assembly?'
[The same as last, reading 'abandoned the precepts,' &c., for 'Pârâgika
offence,' &c.]
6. 'And how (can it be legally said that the person
p. 313
charged) does not submit himself to the legally (prescribed) concord (of the
assembly)?'
[Same as last, reading 'not submit himself to the legally (prescribed) concord
of the assembly,' &c., instead of 'abandon the precepts,' &c.]
7. 'And how (can it be legally said that the person charged) withdraws his
acceptance of the legally (established) concord (of the assembly)?'
[Same as last, reading 'withdraws his acceptance,' &c., for 'does not submit,'
&c.]
8. 'And how can it be legally said that the person charged has been seen or
heard or suspected of having committed an offence against morality . . . . an
offence against conduct . . . . an offence against doctrine?'
[Same as 4, reading 'offence against morality,' &c., for 'Pârâgika offence.]
These are the ten kinds of the inhibition of Pâtimokkha which are legal.
________________________
Here ends the First Portion for Recitation.
Footnotes
309:1 The paragraph is repeated in the section full for each of these cases.
309:2 Kata . . . . akatâ . . . . katâkatâ we have rendered here and below as
offence of omission--of commission--of both, as seems imperatively demanded by
the context. Buddhaghosa, however, says, Akatâya ti tena puggalena sâ vipatti
katâ vâ hotu akatâ vâ pâtimokkha-thapanakassa saññâ amûlika-vasena amûlikâ hoti.
Katâkatâyâ ti katañ ka akatañ ka ubhayam gahetvâ vuttam.
310:1 This and the following phrase are further enlarged upon in 6 4 and the
following sections.
310:2 See our note on Mahâvagga II, 22, 3.
310:3 See Mahâvagga X, 5, 13, &c.
310:4 Pakkâdîyati. Buddhaghosa says here, pakkâdîyatî ti puna kâtabbam kammam
pakkâdîyati. Tena ukkotanake pâkittiyam âpaggati.
312:1 See the rule laid down in Mahâvagga II, 15, 4.
0 comments:
Post a Comment