Vipassana - The Way of Mindfulness

Computer Studies in Buddhism - Meditation
"Vipassana Meditation Course: Series of Eight Talks", by Ven Sayadaw U Janaka
Buddha Dhamma Meditation Association, Sydney, AUSTRALIA



Talk 5
The Way of Mindfulness



  Yesterday I explained briefly the five mental faculties of meditators. Of
  these five mental faculties the last one, pannya, wisdom, realisation or right
  understanding is the predominant factor of the five. So you have to practise
  insight meditation, vipassana meditation in order to rightly understand of
  mentality and physicality. When you have rightly understood mental and
  physical processes as they really are you'll be able to do away with mental
  defilements which are the causes of suffering. That's why you have to develop
  your mindfulness, which is the cause of deep concentration on which right
  understanding or insight knowledge is built up.
  So to do right understanding, bodily processes and material processes as they
  really are, you need deep concentration of the mind. To gain deep
  concentration of the mind you need continuous powerful and diligent
  mindfulness. To have continuous and constant mindfulness you need strenuous
  effort in your practise, intensively so that your mindfulness becomes
  continuous and constant for the whole day.
  And to attain the continuity of mindfulness for the whole day you have to not
  only practise sitting meditation and walking meditation, but also awareness of
  our daily activities. Because aside from the times for sitting and walking
  there are times when you are doing your daily activities such as washing or
  showering, taking meals, drinking, and laundering, and also preparing your bed
  at bed time. So if you apply this mindfulness only to sitting and working, if
  you do not apply it to the other general activities of the day, then your
  mindfulness is not continuous and constant. It doesn't become powerful and
  sharp and diligent.
  Mindfulness becomes continuous, constant and uninterrupted only when you make
  proper effort and awareness of your daily activities, and it becomes sharp.
  Only when mindfulness becomes continuous and constant does your mind become
  well concentrated on any mental or physical object which is observed. That
  concentration gives rise to right understanding or insight knowledge which
  penetrates into the true nature of mental and physical phenomena. That's why
  it's indispensable for a meditator to put a reasonable effort into awareness
  of daily activities, as much as possible.
  To be aware of your general activities of the day you have to slow down all
  actions and movements, all activities. Then you can be aware of almost all
  daily activities in more and more detail. Though you do these general
  activities of the day normally, in a normal pace, you can be aware of them but
  not in detail. But you can do it generally. General awareness is not so much
  powerful. It doesn't make your mindfulness continuous and constant,
  uninterrupted.
  So meditators need to have detailed mindfulness of daily activities as much as
  possible, slowing down actions and movement as much as possible. Only then
  does mindfulness become continuous and constant and gives rise to deep
  concentration of the mind which is the cause of right understanding. That is
  why the Lord Buddha dealt with a separate chapter on awareness of daily
  activities in his discourse of the four foundations of mindfulness, the
  Mahasatipatthana sutta.
  Without awareness of daily activities you can't concentrate your mind very
  well or deeply. When concentration's not deep enough there won't arise any
  insight knowledge or experiencing knowledge which penetrates into the
  intrinsic nature of mental and physical phenomena. That's why we should try to
  be aware of more daily activities in more detail day by day.
  So when you are successful in noting all these activities of the day in more
  and more detail, the mindfulness becomes constant and powerful, and
  concentration becomes deeper and deeper. Then pannya or wisdom or right
  understanding or insight knowledge becomes penetrating and realises body-mind
  processes and two levels of understanding. Here those meditators who have
  obtained deep concentration realise the bodily processes of nama and rupa,
  mentality and mind, and two levels of understanding.
  The first one is understanding of the specific or individual characteristics
  of mental and physical phenomena. The second one is understanding of general
  or common characteristics of mental and physical phenomena.
  When you have understood the specific characteristics of mental and physical
  phenomena then you can exterminate the false idea of a person, a being, an I
  or a you, a self or a soul, which is the seat of all mental defilements and
  hindrances. Then what are the specific characteristics of mental and physical
  phenomena; what are the individual characteristics of mental and physical
  phenomena? As to mental phenomena, when you note rising, falling of the
  abdomen; or lifting, pushing, dropping of the foot; or bending of the arms,
  stretching of the arms, then there's a mental process that knows the object,
  rising, falling movement, lifting, pushing, dropping movement, bending,
  stretching movement of the arm.
  The phenomenon which knows the object is called chitta. Chitta is sometimes
  translated into consciousness but in other times into mind. Whether it's
  translated into consciousness or mind its characteristic is cognising the
  characteristic instead of cognising the object or perceiving the object. So,
  cognising or perceiving of the object is the individual characteristic of
  citta or consciousness or mind. When you note rising, falling, rising,
  falling; or sitting, touching, sitting, touching; when your mindfulness
  becomes sharp and concentration becomes deep, then you come to distinguish
  between the object and the subject. The object is the rising and falling
  movement; the subject is the mind that notes it or cognises it or knows it or
  perceives it. You can differentiate between the object physical process and
  the subject mental process that knows it.
  When concentration becomes deeper what you are realising is this dual process
  of mental and physical phenomena. Then you come to rightly understand that the
  rising movement is one process, the mind that knows it is the other process.
  There are two processes which are arising at the same moment. The falling
  movement is one process; the mind that cognises it is the other process. Then
  again you come to realise the rising movement hasn't any power to know any
  object. The same with the falling movement. Falling movement hasn't any
  ability to know or to perceive any object. But the mind that knows it has the
  ability of perceiving the object, of cognising the object. In this way you
  come to differentiate between nama and rupa, mental phenomena and physical
  phenomena.
  Then here you come to know that so-called opposing is composed of physical
  processes and mental processes. So-called opposing is nothing but natural
  processes of mental and physical phenomena. When you have rightly understood
  in this way you don't have in your mind the false idea of opposing being, an I
  or a you, a self or a soul, because what you are realising is the dual process
  of mental and physical phenomena.
  There, when you come to realise the noting mind is able to perceive the object
  or cognise the object, rising movement or falling; or lifting movement,
  pushing movement and dropping movement. But physical process hasn't any
  ability to perceive or to cognise anything. This understanding is that of
  specific or individual characteristics of the mind or the consciousness by
  rightly understanding the mind and its characteristics and also the physical
  process and its characteristics. Then you have destroyed the idea of a person,
  a being, an I or a you. That means when distinguishing physical processes from
  that of mind or mentality you don't identify mental processes, that's noting
  mind with yourself or your person. Then you have no idea of a person, a being,
  a self or a soul.
  In the same way you do not identify physical processes, that's a rising and
  falling movement of the abdomen, with yourself or your person. You know
  separately mental process is one thing, physical process that the mind notes
  is the other. Neither mental process is a person or being. A physical process
  is also not a being, a person, a self or a soul. In this way you come to
  destroy the false idea of a person, a being, a self or a soul. It's called
  sakkaya-ditthi, atta-ditthi.
  Sakkaya-ditthi, atta-ditthi, the false idea of a self, a soul, a person or
  being is the seat of all mental defilements such as desire, grieving, greed,
  lust, hatred, anger, ill-will, ignorance, conceit, jealousy, and so on. All
  these mental defilements arise dependent on the idea of a person, a being, a
  self or a soul. This false idea of a person, a being, a self or a soul,
  sakkaya- ditthi, atta-ditthi, is the seat of all mental defilements which are
  the causes of suffering, dukkha.
  When you consider these mental and physical processes theoretically, you can
  have some knowledge of mental and physical processes which are neither a
  person nor a being, neither a self nor a soul. So when you are able to watch
  the rising and falling movement or lifting movement, pushing and dropping
  movement of the foot, or bending of the arm or stretching of the arm, you are
  able to know clearly or perceive there's a rising movement of the abdomen and
  there's a falling movement of the abdomen.
  So the mind that knows these objects, when you can differentiate between the
  rising and falling movement and the mind that knows it you can answer if
  someone asks you whether the mind that knows is a person or the process of a
  rising and falling movement, a person or being. That question can be very
  easily answered by you when you differentiate between the rising and falling
  movement of the abdomen and the mind that notes it.
  Shall I put a question to you about this aspect of Dhamma? Which is a person
  or a being, a self, the rising or falling movement or the mind that notes it?
  The rising movement is not a person. Then is the falling movement a person or
  a self? No. Then is the mind that notes it a person or a self or a soul. No.
  Then what are they? They are natural processes. The rising movement is a
  natural process of material phenomena. The falling movement is also a natural
  process of physical phenomena. The mind that notes, knows it, is a natural
  process of mental phenomena. All these three are natural processes. No part of
  them is a person, a being or a self.
  Then during your contemplation of the rising and falling movement of the
  abdomen do you find any person or being, self or soul? No. Then, what's the
  thing you find? A natural process of mentality and physicality. But before we
  are able to realise this dual process of mentality and physicality we take the
  mind for a person, a being, an I or a you. I note, I know. Who knows? Who has
  the ability of perceiving or knowing the object? A person or a self has the
  ability of knowing or perceiving an object. Is it right? No. Then what has
  that ability? The mind has the ability of knowing, cognising the object.
  Then is the mind a person, a being? No. But before we are able to
  differentiate between these two processes of mentality and physicality we take
  the mind to be a person, a being because we take, I know or you know. It
  applies to a person, but actually there is no person, no being, no self who
  knows the object. Only the mind has the ability of knowing or cognising the
  object.
  When we clearly see the two processes of mental and physical phenomena in our
  practise of insight meditation we don't take mental processes to be a person.
  We don't take physical processes to be a person because we know that the
  physical is just the natural process of materiality. Mental process is just
  the natural process of mentality. Neither of them are a person, a being, an I
  or a you.
  To rightly understand this dual process as just the natural processes of
  mentality and physicality what we need is deep concentration. Unless your mind
  is well concentrated on any mental or physical object which is observed, you
  are unable to realise in this way. So deep concentration of mind is required
  to rightly understand this dual process of mental and physical phenomena and
  their true nature. Then after entering into deep concentration what should we
  do? And what do we need? To obtain deep concentration of the mind what do we
  need? Mindfulness. Sparse mindfulness. Continuous mindfulness. Continuous
  constant uninterrupted mindfulness is the most important factor to obtain deep
  concentration and right understanding of phenomena.
  If we need continuous and constant mindfulness what should we do? Should we
  speak to each other or should we lie down and sleep? What should we do? Yes.
  Note all activities in sitting, in walking, and doing daily activities. These
  are three aspects of this practise. When you lay stress on only sitting and
  walking does your mindfulness become continuous or constant? No. Then what
  should we do to have continuous and constant mindfulness? clearly. Be aware of
  all actions and movements for the whole day.
  That's why the Lord Buddha teaches us in a separate chapter on awareness of
  all daily activities in the Maha-satipatthana Sutta. It's called
  sampajanna-papa. Sampajanna means clear comprehension or full awareness. Papa
  here means the chapter. There the Buddha said, 'When you go forward you must
  be mindful of it, as it is. When you go backward you must be mindful of it as
  it is.'
  Sometimes when you come to the interview room you mindfully come there, you
  walk left, right or lifting, pushing, dropping. But when you have interview
  you get up and walk out unmindfully. Is it in conformity to the Buddha's
  teaching? When you go forward you should be mindful of it. When you go
  backward you should be mindful of it.
  'When you look straight you should be mindful of it. When you look aside you
  should be mindful of it.' And did you watch when you looked at something? No.
  That's what Buddha said. When you look at something you note looking, looking,
  then seeing, seeing. After looking you must note seeing. Why? When you look at
  something don't you see it? Maybe you're blind. A blind man cannot see even
  though he looks at something. You see the Buddha said, 'When you walk to
  certain distance you must be as if you are blind. You must be as if you are
  deaf.' That means a blind man cannot see anything when he walks to a
  destination. If he cannot see anything, in that case does he have any
  defilement in his mind as to the visible thing? No, because he doesn't see it.

  The Buddha said, 'When you walk to a destination you must be like a blind
  man.' How? When you look at something you note looking, looking, looking,
  seeing, seeing, seeing, seeing. If you are noting of seeing and looking it is
  constant and powerful. You can't differentiate the visible thing, whether it's
  good or bad, pleasant or unpleasant. You don't have any idea of the visible
  thing which is looked at by you and seen by you. Why? Because of mindfulness.
  Seeing, seeing, seeing, looking, looking, looking, looking.
  The same with hearing. When you hear some sound constantly and persistently
  note hearing, hearing, hearing, hearing, hearing, hearing. When that noting
  becomes powerful then you do not know what you are hearing. Or you do not
  differentiate between pleasantness and unpleasantness of the things which
  hurt, because of mindfulness. Then you don't have any defilement in your mind.
  You are like a deaf person or a blind person.
  So when you want to be like a blind or deaf person what should you do? Note.
  Be mindful of what you are hearing and of what you are looking and seeing.
  Make a mental note as looking, looking, seeing, seeing, hearing, hearing, and
  so on.
  That means at that moment it seems that there are two processes of mentality.
  One process is the process of seeing. The other process is the process for
  noting it. And the two processes are arising in the same way, you think.
  Actually the two minds don't arise at the same moment, but arising and passing
  away of mentality is so swift and so instant that you cannot differentiate the
  previous mind and the following mind. They become continuous. So you think at
  the same moment you have the process of looking and the process of noting it.
  When the process of looking and seeing becomes powerful the process of noting
  becomes weak. Then you can see the visible object, that's something, very
  clearly, and you get the idea of good or bad about this object.
  When you take the object to be good then you feel pleasant about it. When you
  take the object to be bad you feel unpleasant about it. When you feel pleasant
  about this object then there arises a desire to have it. Desire, then
  attachment, then craving arises because you take it to be pleasant. And when
  you take that object to be unpleasant then you get aversion, dosa. Aversion is
  also defilement. Attachment, desire is also defilement, impurities of mind.
  Then which is better? Is aversion better or is desire better? Neither is
  better. Then either of these may be good. Yes, neither is it good. Why are
  these aversions and desires bad? Because they are dukkha. When you have
  aversion it is dukkha. When you have desire it is dukkha. When you have
  attachment it is dukkha. So these defilements are bad, disadvantages.
  So if you want to feel sukkha, if you want to live in sukkha or happiness and
  peace, what you should do is overcome or remove these mental defilements which
  are dukkha and the causes of dukkha, suffering. That's why the Buddha teaches
  that when you look at something note looking, looking, seeing, seeing, so that
  your consciousness of seeing doesn't have time enough to analyse that object.
  If the consciousness of seeing has time enough to analyse the object then that
  consciousness will know pleasantness or unpleasantness of the object.
  So as not to have enough time to analyse this object, what you should do?
  Note. Note seeing, seeing, or looking, looking. When a person is walking on
  the road very steadily then he can reach the destination in a short time. But
  if someone goes to him and knocks his leg with a stick what would happen to
  him? He couldn't walk properly and steadily. Sometimes he may fall. Then again
  he gets up again and walks. Could he reach his destination in a short time?
  No. In the same way is consciousness here. Looking is like a person who walks
  to a destination. The noting mind is like a person who knocks or who hits it
  with a stick. You follow this simile? That's the way.
  So when you look at something note looking, looking, looking. When you see it
  note seeing, seeing, seeing, seeing, seeing constantly and persistently and
  energetically. When your noting is not energetic then consciousness of seeing
  becomes powerful and overwhelms this noting. Then that consciousness will
  think about or analyse that object which is seen and it will come to feel
  pleasant or unpleasant about the object. When the noting mind notes seeing,
  seeing, seeing, seeing, looking, looking, looking, the consciousness of seeing
  doesn't have enough time to think about the object or analyse it because it's
  weak. Why is it weak? Because of knocking or striking by the noting mind.
  So, when you note seeing, seeing, looking, looking, the consciousness of
  seeing becomes gradually weak because of the noting mind. Then it is not able
  to analyse the object, think about the object. What he is able to do is just
  see it, that's all. Just seeing it, that's all. It see the object then it
  passes away. Then another consciousness arises and sees the object and it
  passes away. Then another consciousness see it and it passes away.
  Then the mind which sees the object does not have any idea of good or bad
  about the object, or pleasant or unpleasant. It has just neutral feeling. This
  neutral feeling is also very weak. If you take the object to be bad or
  unpleasant, the unpleasant feeling will be stronger. Then you'll have aversion
  or hatred towards this object. When that seeing mind takes the object to be
  good or pleasant that pleasant feeling will be stronger. Then you would have
  desire for the object because the pleasant feeling is because of desire or
  attachment.
  You know the law of dependent origination. Attachment or desire arises through
  pleasant feelings, through feeling or sensation. So when the mind takes the
  object to be good or pleasant there will arise a desire or attachment. Then
  when the mind has very weak neutral feeling about the object do you have
  attachment or aversion? You have neither attachment nor aversion because your
  neutral feeling about the object is very weak. Then when you don't have any of
  the mental defilements do you have suffering, dukkha? No. Here suffering
  ceases regarding this physical object because you rightly know it, rightly
  understand it, and realise it. Just the one which is seen that's all.
  In the same way when you know hearing, hearing. When the noting mind becomes
  powerful and constant, hearing becomes weak. Then the consciousness of hearing
  cannot analyse or think about the object. It doesn't take the object to be bad
  or good, pleasant or unpleasant. Then the consciousness of hearing would have
  very weak neutral feeling about the object. There won't arise any attachment,
  desire or aversion, hatred or anger and you won't have any mental defilements.
  Then you are free from suffering, dukkha as to these audible objects.